Therapeutic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with febrile neutropenia: a comprehensive systematic review for clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022 from the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia represents a critical oncologic emergency, and its management is pivotal in cancer therapy. In several guidelines, the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia is not routinely recommended except in high-risk cases. The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology has updated its clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF, incorporating a systematic review to address this clinical question. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted by performing a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web, focusing on publications from January 1990 to December 2019. Selected studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, and cohort and case-control studies. Evaluated outcomes included overall survival, infection-related mortality, hospitalization duration, quality of life, and pain. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 332 records. Following two rounds of screening, two records were selected for both qualitative and quantitative synthesis including meta-analysis. Regarding infection-related mortality, the event to case ratio was 5:134 (3.73%) in the G-CSF group versus 6:129 (4.65%) in the non-G-CSF group, resulting in a relative risk of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-2.58; p = 0.54), which was not statistically significant. Only median values for hospitalization duration were available from the two RCTs, precluding a meta-analysis. For overall survival, quality of life, and pain, no suitable studies were found for analysis, rendering their assessment unfeasible. CONCLUSION: A weak recommendation is made that G-CSF treatment not be administered to patients with febrile neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy. G-CSF treatment can be considered for patients at high risk.

Comparison between a single dose of PEG G-CSF and multiple doses of non-PEG G-CSF: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.

BACKGROUD: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used for the primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN). Two types of G-CSF are available in Japan, namely G-CSF chemically bound to polyethylene glycol (PEG G-CSF), which provides long-lasting effects with a single dose, and non-polyethylene glycol-bound G-CSF (non-PEG G-CSF), which must be sequentially administrated for several days. METHODS: This current study investigated the utility of these treatments for the primary prophylaxis of FN through a systematic review of the literature. A detailed literature search for related studies was performed using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library. Data were independently extracted and assessed by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis or meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate six outcomes. RESULTS: Through the first and second screenings, 23 and 18 articles were extracted for qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis, respectively. The incidence of FN was significantly lower in the PEG G-CSF group than in the non-PEG G-CSF group with a strong quality/certainty of evidence. The differences in other outcomes, such as overall survival, infection-related mortality, the duration of neutropenia (less than 500/µL), quality of life, and pain, were not apparent. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of PEG G-CSF is strongly recommended over multiple-dose non-PEG G-CSF therapy for the primary prophylaxis of FN.

Effectiveness of G-CSF in chemotherapy for digestive system tumors: a systematic review of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022 delineated by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reportedly reduces the risk of neutropenia and subsequent infections caused by cancer chemotherapy. Although several guidelines recommend using G-CSF in primary prophylaxis according to the incidence rate of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN), the effectiveness of G-CSF in digestive system tumor chemotherapy remains unclear. To address these clinical questions, we conducted a systematic review as part of revising the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022 published by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology. METHODS: This systematic review addressed two main clinical questions (CQ): CQ1: "Is primary prophylaxis with G-CSF effective in chemotherapy?", and CQ2: "Is increasing the intensity of chemotherapy with G-CSF effective?" We reviewed different types of digestive system tumors, including esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, biliary tract, colorectal, and neuroendocrine carcinomas. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases were searched for information sources. Independent systematic reviewers conducted two rounds of screening and selected relevant records for each CQ. Finally, the working group members synthesized the strength of evidence and recommendations. RESULTS: After two rounds of screening, 5/0/3/0/2/0 records were extracted for CQ1 of esophageal/gastric/pancreatic/biliary tract/colorectal/ and neuroendocrine carcinoma, respectively. Additionally, a total of 2/6/1 records were extracted for CQ2 of esophageal/pancreatic/colorectal cancer, respectively. The strength of evidence and recommendations were evaluated for CQ1 of colorectal cancer; however, we could not synthesize recommendations for other CQs owing to the lack of records. CONCLUSION: The use of G-CSF for primary prophylaxis in chemotherapy for colorectal cancer is inappropriate.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during dose-dense chemotherapy for urothelial cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) decreases the incidence, duration, and severity of febrile neutropenia (FN); however, dose reduction or withdrawal is often preferred in the management of adverse events in the treatment of urothelial cancer. It is also important to maintain therapeutic intensity in order to control disease progression and thereby relieve symptoms, such as hematuria, infection, bleeding, and pain, as well as to prolong the survival. In this clinical question, we compared treatment with primary prophylactic administration of G-CSF to maintain therapeutic intensity with conventional standard therapy without G-CSF and examined the benefits and risks as major outcomes. A detailed literature search for relevant studies was performed using PubMed, Ichu-shi Web, and Cochrane Library. Data were extracted and evaluated independently by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis of the pooled data was performed, and the risk ratios with corresponding confidence intervals were calculated and summarized in a meta-analysis. Seven studies were included in the qualitative analysis, two of which were reviewed in the meta-analysis of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) therapy, and one randomized controlled study showed a reduction in the incidence of FN. Primary prophylactic administration of G-CSF may be beneficial, as shown in a randomized controlled study of dose-dense MVAC therapy. However, there are no studies on other regimens, and we made a "weak recommendation to perform" with an annotation of the relevant regimen (dose-dense MVAC).

Optimal timing of prophylactic pegylated G-CSF after chemotherapy administration for patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.

INTRODUCTION: The timing of prophylactic pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration during cancer chemotherapy varies, with Day 2 and Days 3-5 being the most common schedules. Optimal timing remains uncertain, affecting efficacy and adverse events. This systematic review sought to evaluate the available evidence on the timing of prophylactic pegylated G-CSF administration. METHODS: Based on the Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development, we searched the PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and Cochrane Library databases for literature published from January 1990 to December 2019. The inclusion criteria included studies among the adult population using pegfilgrastim. The search strategy focused on timing-related keywords. Two reviewers independently extracted and assessed the data. RESULTS: Among 300 initial search results, only four articles met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis for febrile neutropenia incidence suggested a potential higher incidence when pegylated G-CSF was administered on Days 3-5 than on Day 2 (odds ratio: 1.27, 95% CI 0.66-2.46, p = 0.47), with a moderate certainty of evidence. No significant difference in overall survival or mortality due to infections was observed. The trend of severe adverse events was lower on Days 3-5, without statistical significance (odds ratio: 0.72, 95% CI 0.14-3.67, p = 0.69) and with a moderate certainty of evidence. Data on pain were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Both Day 2 and Days 3-5 were weakly recommended for pegylated G-CSF administration post-chemotherapy in patients with cancer. The limited evidence highlights the need for further research to refine recommendations.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis of G-CSF during chemotherapy for prostate cancer, Japanese clinical guideline for appropriate use of G-CSF: clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (DTX) is commonly used as a primary chemotherapy, and cabazitaxel (CBZ) has shown efficacy in patients who are DTX resistant. Primary prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy is currently used with CBZ treatment in routine clinical care in Japan. METHODS: In this study, we performed a systematic review following the Minds guidelines to investigate the effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during chemotherapy for prostate cancer and to construct G-CSF guidelines for primary prophylaxis use during chemotherapy. A comprehensive literature search of various electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi) was performed on January 10, 2020, to identify studies published between January 1990 and December 31, 2019 that investigate the impact of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during CBZ administration on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Ultimately, nine articles were included in the qualitative systematic review. Primary G-CSF prophylaxis during CBZ administration for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer was difficult to assess in terms of correlation with overall survival, mortality from infection, and patients' quality of life. These difficulties were owing to the lack of randomized controlled trials comparing patients with and without primary prophylaxis of G-CSF during CBZ administration. However, some retrospective studies have suggested that it may reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION: G-CSF may be beneficial as primary prophylaxis during CBZ administration for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, and we made a "weak recommendation to perform" with an annotation of the relevant regimen.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis to develop clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly administered to cancer patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy, especially when incidence rate of febrile neutropenia (FN) surpasses 20%. While primary prophylaxis with G-CSF has been proven effective in preventing FN in patients with cancer, there is limited evidence regarding its efficacy in specifically, lung cancer. Our systematic review focused on the efficacy of G-CSF primary prophylaxis in lung cancer. METHODS: We extracted studies on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) using the PubMed, Ichushi Web, and Cochrane Library databases. Two reviewers assessed the extracted studies for each type of lung cancer and conducted quantitative and meta-analyses of preplanned outcomes, including overall survival, FN incidence, infection-related mortality, quality of life, and musculoskeletal pain. RESULTS: A limited number of studies were extracted: two on NSCLC and six on SCLC. A meta-analysis was not conducted owing to insufficient data on NSCLC. Two case-control studies explored the efficacy of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF in patients with NSCLC (on docetaxel and ramucirumab therapy) and indicated a lower FN frequency with G-CSF. For SCLC, meta-analysis of five studies showed no significant reduction in FN incidence, with an odds ratio of 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.03-5.56, P = 0.48). Outcomes other than FN incidence could not be evaluated due to low data availability. CONCLUSION: Limited data are available on G-CSF prophylaxis in lung cancer. Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF may be weakly recommended in Japanese patients with NSCLC undergoing docetaxel and ramucirumab combination therapy.

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Chemotherapy-induced Alopecia Distress Scale.

BACKGROUND: The Chemotherapy-induced Alopecia Distress Scale (CADS) is a patient-reported outcome measure for assessing distress associated with Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA). This study aimed to confirm the psychometric validity of the Japanese version of the CADS (CADS-J). METHODS: A total of 132 patients with breast cancer who developed CIA were asked to complete the CADS-J twice at 2 week intervals to confirm test-retest reliability. The body image domain of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) breast cancer-specific module, the self-esteem scale from the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the emotional domain of the EORTC QLQ Core 30 were used to confirm the convergent validity of the CADS-J. The overall quality of life and physical domains of the EORTC QLQ Core 30 were used to confirm the discriminant validity of the CADS-J. RESULTS: In total, 125 participants provided valid responses. The mean age was 52.2 years. The overall Cronbach's alpha for the CADS-J was 0.903. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the first and second responses were r = 0.874, r = 0.952, r = 0.911, and r = 0.959 for the physical domain, emotional domain, activity domain, and relationship domain, respectively. In terms of convergent validity, the total CADS-J score was moderately correlated with body image (r = - 0.63), self-esteem (r = - 0.48), and the emotional domain (r = - 0.61). Regarding discriminant validity, the total CADS-J score was weakly correlated with the overall quality of life (r = - 0.34) and physical domain (r = - 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: The CADS-J is psychometrically reliable and valid for evaluating the distress caused by CIA. It is expected to be used in daily practice and as an endpoint in various studies.

Simultaneous Tumor Shrinkage and Bronchial Perforation Induced by Nivolumab plus Cabozantinib Combination Therapy in a Patient with Collecting Duct Carcinoma.

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors are known to cause perforation as one of their severe side effects, and postoperative and postradiation therapy are known risk factors. However, there are few studies on perforation following tumor shrinkage. A 78-year-old woman with postoperative recurring left collecting duct carcinoma of the right hilar lymph nodes and mediastinum underwent eight courses of nivolumab plus cabozantinib, resulting in tumor shrinkage. Three days after the last administration, she developed fever and cough and was hospitalized for right lobar pneumonia. The patient received long-term antibiotics for bronchial fistula with the destruction of the bronchial wall and secondary lung abscess. When using nivolumab plus cabozantinib combination therapy for a tumor with bronchial invasion, physicians should be aware of bronchial perforation as the tumor shrinks.

Complete response of metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus to nivolumab plus cabozantinib.

Introduction: The effectiveness of nivolumab plus cabozantinib for metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus remains unclear. Case presentation: A 77-year-old male was diagnosed with right papillary renal cell carcinoma with a metastatic lesion on Gerota's fascia, lymph node metastasis, and inferior vena cava tumor thrombus. He was treated with nivolumab plus cabozantinib. As all lesions regressed enough to permit complete resection, radical nephrectomy, thrombectomy, and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection were performed. No viable malignant cells were identified histopathologically. Despite the discontinuation of nivolumab plus cabozantinib, there has been no recurrence for 9 months. Conclusion: Nivolumab plus cabozantinib has effectiveness for metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus.

One-year changes in activities of daily living and social life in elderly patients undergoing home-based rehabilitation within 1 year of stroke onset.

[Purpose] In this study, we investigated changes in activities of daily living and social participation over 1 year in elderly patients with stroke, who underwent home-based rehabilitation. [Participants and Methods] This 1 year, multicenter cohort study included patients aged ≥65 years with diagnosis of the first onset of stroke within 1 year. Variables recorded included the functional independence measure and performance qualifiers for "d6 domestic life" and "d9 community, social, and civic life" (social life) based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework. [Results] Of the 44 partients recruited at baseline, 19 completed the study over 1 year. We observed significant improvements in the functional independence measure-motor, functional independence measure-cognitive, and functional independence measure-total and in the performance qualifiers ("domestic life" and "social life") of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health tool. We also observed that the functional independence measure-total scores improved over 3 months and "domestic life" and "social life" scores gradually improved over 1 year. [Conclusion] Our results showed that activities of daily living improved earlier than other variables, including social participation, which gradually improved over 1 year and that home-based rehabilitation may effectively improve activities of daily living and social participation.

The prevalence of lynch syndrome (DNA mismatch repair protein deficiency) in patients with primary localized prostate cancer using immunohistochemistry screening.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is one of the most heritable human cancers. Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant inheritance caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, which are also associated with an increased incidence of prostate cancer. However, prostate cancer has not been defined as a Lynch syndrome-associated cancer. The proportion of Lynch syndrome patients in primary prostate cancers is unclear. In this study, we investigated MMR protein loss using universal immunohistochemical screening to determine the prevalence of Lynch syndrome in patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy. METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine surgical specimens from radical prostatectomy performed at Toranomon Hospital between 2012 and 2015 were retrospectively tested using universal screening with immunohistochemistry staining for expression of the MMR proteins MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6. For all suspected MMR-deficient patients, germline genetic tests focusing on MMR genes were performed. RESULTS: MMR protein loss was found in only one patient (0.8%) who showed dual MSH2/MSH6 loss. This patient showed a single nucleotide pathogenic germline mutation from c.1129 C to T (p.Gln377*) at exon 7 in the MSH2 gene. He was diagnosed with a primary prostate cancer at 66 years of age. He had a documented history of Lynch syndrome (Muir-Torre syndrome) with previous colon cancer, sebaceous tumor, and keratoacanthoma as well as subsequent bladder cancer, all of which also showed dual MSH2/MSH6 loss. He also had a strong family history of colorectal and other Lynch syndrome-associated cancers. The pathological stage was pT3aN0M0, and the pathological grade was Gleason 7(4 + 3) with tertiary pattern 5. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, immunohistochemical screening of MMR proteins for Lynch syndrome was performed in a series of prostate cancer cases. The prevalence of Lynch syndrome in localized prostate cancer was 0.8%, which is low compared with other Lynch syndrome-associated cancers.

Association between immune-related adverse events and survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab: immortal time bias-corrected analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with immune check inhibitors are associated with favourable response rate and survivals in multiple cancers, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The aim of this study was to investigate how irAEs were associated with improved survivals in advanced RCC patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab at six centres, institutions, or hospitals between September 2018 and February 2022. We assessed associations of the development and the number of irAEs with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). To eliminate immortal time bias, landmark analysis and a Cox model with time-dependent variables were used. RESULTS: This study included 129 patients with a median follow-up of 12.3 months. The 2-year OS and PFS rates were 55% and 42%, respectively. Ninety six patients experienced irAEs. The development of irAEs was positively associated with OS and PFS rates (hazard ratio [HR] 0.328, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.165-0.648, p = 0.001; HR 0.334, 95% CI 0.151-0.737, p = 0.007). Patients who experienced multiple irAEs had longer OS (HR 0.507, 95% CI 0.235-1.097, p = 0.085 or HR 0.245, 95% CI 0.110-0.544, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.572, 95% CI 0.316-1.036, p = 0.085 or HR 0.267, 95% CI 0.113-0.628, p = 0.002) compared with those who experienced single or zero irAE. CONCLUSIONS: Developing irAEs, particularly multiple irAEs, is associated with favourable survivals in advanced RCC patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

BRAF Mutation Heterogeneity Detected Using Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing in Synchronous Colon Cancer: A Case Report.

Background/Aim: Synchronous colorectal cancer, which occurs in approximately 4.8-8.4% of all colorectal cancers, has a genetic profile with a higher rate of v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) mutation and microsatellite instability-high than solitary colorectal cancer. However, little information is available on heterogeneity among tumor lesions because of difficulty in performing genetic tests in all lesions in clinical practice. Case Report: A 44-year-old man presented with multiple recurrent lung metastases 42 months after the endoscopic resection of early stage synchronous ascending and sigmoid colon cancers. The genetic testing of sigmoid colon cancer tissue samples, their state being more advanced than that of ascending colon cancer, revealed a v-Ki-ras 2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog mutation (G13C) and BRAF wild type. However, the tumor was refractory to initial chemotherapy and rapidly progressed to new liver metastases. Therefore, we suspected that there may be biological heterogeneity between the primary sigmoid colon lesion and liver metastases. Next, we performed next-generation sequencing on circulating tumor DNA from the patient's plasma (Foundation One Liquid CDx®), which revealed the V600E mutation of BRAF, suggesting that there was genetic heterogeneity among the synchronized primary lesions, one of which was responsible for the chemo-refractory rapid-growing liver metastases. Conclusion: Genetic profiling with liquid biopsy at the time of recurrence and metastasis may be useful in patients with multiple synchronous cancers because there is less heterogeneity between primary and metastatic sites.

A Case Report of Aggressive Fumarate Hydrase-deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma With Loss of HLA Antigens.

BACKGROUND: Fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare RCC subtype, and FH-deficient RCC may be misdiagnosed as another type of RCC, such as type 2 papillary RCC or collecting duct carcinoma. FH and 2-succinocysteine (2SC) are useful diagnostic markers for FH-deficient RCC and can be measured using immunohistochemistry (IHC). CASE REPORT: A 30-year-old female with 3-month history of fatigue and left-flank mass was diagnosed with a 20×13×10 cm left-side renal mass with massive inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus that extended into the right atrium. She underwent nephrectomy and IVC thrombectomy, and a pathological diagnosis of type 2 papillary RCC was made. Four months after the surgery, computed tomography scan showed multiple liver metastases not observed immediately after surgery. Systemic treatment with sorafenib was initiated; however, she did not respond and died 3 months after treatment. Subsequent re-review of hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections indicated morphologic characteristics consistent with FH-deficient RCC, and IHC staining was negative for FH but positive for 2SC, indicating a diagnosis of FH-deficient RCC. Further immunological analyses revealed the loss of HLA-class I, b2 microglobulin, and HLA-DR antigens in cancer cells. In addition, a few CD8-positive cytotoxic T cells and CD163-positive tumor-associated macrophages were noted. CONCLUSION: An immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that facilitates cancer immune evasion might be associated with the rapid progression and poor prognosis in our patient. Further investigation of the tumor immune microenvironment in patients with FH-deficient RCC is warranted.

Nationwide Database Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Decreased Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Preserving activities of daily living (ADL) is the key issue for Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and their caregivers. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the ADL level of AD patients at diagnosis and the risk factors associated with decreased ADL during long-term care (≤3 years). METHODS: Medical records of AD patients in a Japanese health insurance claims database were analyzed retrospectively to determine ADL using the Barthel Index (BI) and identify the risk factors associated with decreased ADL. RESULTS: A total of 16,799 AD patients (mean age at diagnosis: 83.6 years, 61.5% female) were analyzed. Female patients were older (84.6 versus 81.9 years; p < 0.001) and had lower BI (46.8 versus 57.6; p < 0.001) and body mass index (BMI) (21.0 versus 21.7 kg/m2; p < 0.001) than male patients at diagnosis. Disability (BI≤60) increased at age≥80 years and was significantly higher in females. Complete disability was most frequent for bathing and grooming. Risk factors for decreased ADL were determined separately by sex through comparing the ADL-preserved and ADL-decreased groups using propensity score matching by age and BI and multivariable logistic regression analysis. In males, decreased ADL was significantly associated with BMI < 21.5 kg/m2, stroke, and hip fracture, and inversely associated with hyperlipidemia. In females, decreased ADL was significantly associated with BMI < 21.5 kg/m2 and vertebral and hip fractures, and inversely associated with lower back pain. CONCLUSION: AD patients with low BMI, stroke, and fractures had increased risks of decreased ADL; such patients should be identified early and managed appropriately, including rehabilitation to preserve ADL.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of cabozantinib compared with everolimus, axitinib, and nivolumab in subsequent line advanced renal cell carcinoma in Japan.

AIMS: The treatment landscape of renal cell carcinoma has changed with the introduction of targeted therapies. While the clinical benefit of cabozantinib is well-established for Japanese patients who have received prior treatment, the economic benefit remains unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of cabozantinib compared with everolimus, axitinib, and nivolumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have failed at least one prior therapy in Japan. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness model was developed using a partitioned survival approach and a public healthcare payer's perspective. Over a lifetime horizon, clinical and economic implications were estimated according to a three-health-state structure: progression-free, post-progression, and death. Key clinical inputs and utilities were derived from the METEOR trial, and a de novo network meta-analysis and cost data were obtained from publicly available Japanese data sources. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated. Costs and health benefits were discounted annually at 2%. RESULTS: Cabozantinib was more costly and effective compared with everolimus and axitinib, with deterministic incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of ¥5,375,559 and ¥2,223,138, respectively. Compared to nivolumab, cabozantinib was predicted to be less costly and more effective. Sensitivity and scenario analyses demonstrated that the key drivers of cost-effectiveness results were the estimation of overall survival and treatment duration, relative efficacy, drug costs, and subsequent treatment costs. LIMITATIONS: METEOR was an international trial but did not enroll any patients from Japan. Efficacy and safety data from METEOR were used as a proxy for the Japanese population following validation by clinical experts, and alternative assumptions specific to clinical practice in Japan were evaluated in scenario analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, cabozantinib is a cost-effective alternative to everolimus, axitinib, and nivolumab for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have received at least one prior line of therapy.

Cabozantinib-induced serum creatine kinase elevation and rhabdomyolysis: a retrospective case series.

PURPOSE: Rhabdomyolysis, which is primarily characterized by serum creatine kinase (CK) elevation, is a potentially fatal disease, and it can occur in a variety of etiologies, including drug-induced. Cabozantinib is one of the standard treatments for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This retrospective case series aimed to investigate the frequency of cabozantinib-induced CK elevation and rhabdomyolysis, and to reveal their detailed clinical features. METHODS: To investigate the frequency of cabozantinib-induced serum CK elevation and rhabdomyolysis, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical information and laboratory data of the patients with advanced RCC who received cabozantinib monotherapy at our institution from April 2020 to April 2023. Data were retrieved from the electronic medical records and the RCC database of our institution. Primary endpoint of the current case series was the frequency of CK elevation and rhabdomyolysis. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were retrieved form the database and 13 were included in the case series (excluded by clinical trial enrollment [n = 2] and short-term administration [n = 1]). Eight (61.5%) patients among them experienced serum CK elevation, including five patients who were classified into grade 1. CK elevation occurred a median of 14 days after initiation of cabozantinib. Two patients with grade 2 or 3 of CK elevation developed rhabdomyolysis with muscle weakness and/or acute kidney injury. CONCLUSIONS: CK elevation may frequently happen during cabozantinib treatment, and in most cases, it may be asymptomatic and may not be clinically problematic. However, medical providers should be aware that symptomatic CK elevations suggestive of rhabdomyolysis may occasionally occur.

Bell's palsy during rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitor.

Introduction: The peripheral nervous system is one of the target organs of immune-related adverse events. Peripheral facial nerve palsy, also called Bell's palsy, which is induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors, is quite rare, and its clinical features are not well known. Case presentation: A man with renal cell carcinoma who received rechallenging immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy developed unilateral facial palsy and was diagnosed with Bell's palsy. He did not have any severe immune-related adverse events during his previous immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Corticosteroid therapy was immediately initiated, and his facial palsy symptoms promptly improved. Conclusion: Physicians should be aware that Bell's palsy can occur as an immune-related adverse event. Additionally, careful observation is necessary during rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors, even in patients who did not have previous immune-related adverse events.